Even as the US-Iran agreement promises to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, marine insurers warn the crisis is far from over, with war-risk premiums for the region still running as much as 30 times above pre-conflict levels. Premiums that averaged roughly 0.1–0.25% of vessel value before the war surged to between 2.5% and 7.5% at the peak — translating into insurance bills of $3 million to $8 million for a single large tanker transit. Insurers say they need months of sustained stability, plus mine-clearance that could take up to six months, before restoring normal cover.
The landmark US-Iran agreement may reopen the Strait of Hormuz, but marine insurers are warning that the practical realities of restoring safe passage — and affordable insurance — will take far longer than a signing ceremony. According to industry participants, war-risk premiums for the Persian Gulf region remain running as much as 30 times above pre-conflict levels even after the deal announcement.
The scale of the repricing has been dramatic. Before the conflict began in late February 2026, war-risk premiums averaged roughly 0.1% to 0.25% of a vessel's hull replacement value, according to data from S&P Global. As hostilities escalated, premiums for the broader Persian Gulf rose to around 1%, while rates for vessels actually transiting the Strait of Hormuz itself climbed to approximately 7.5% at the peak before easing back to between 2.5% and 3%. In absolute terms, insuring a single large oil tanker worth $100 million has cost between $3 million and $8 million per transit during the crisis.
Seb Simmonds, managing director of public sector and international at PEN Underwriting, captured the industry's wariness: 'As you can imagine, we've all been sitting with bated breath, watching the market and seeing what's going to happen. The region remains highly volatile, and it's still a very difficult environment.' A Howden Re analysis described conditions across marine hull war, cargo war, and political violence markets as being under 'extreme' pressure throughout the conflict, with at least 9–15 tankers having sustained damage since hostilities began.
Several structural factors will keep premiums elevated. First, mine-clearance: US defence officials estimate clearing naval mines across the waterway could take up to six months. Jakob Larsen, head of maritime security at BIMCO, warned that residual mine risks alone could delay full restoration of commercial traffic, with confined navigation corridors only about 3km wide in each direction restricting throughput even after safe passage resumes. Second, insurers embedded seven-day cancellation provisions in war-risk policies during the crisis, allowing rapid withdrawal and repricing of cover — a structural caution that will persist. Third, Svein Ringbakken, managing director of the Norwegian Shipowners' Mutual War Risks Insurance Association, noted that thousands of ships remained trapped in and around the waterway as of mid-June.
Marine insurers say they require months of sustained stability and demonstrated security before restoring anything resembling normal pre-war cover, meaning the cost of moving oil and goods through the world's most critical energy chokepoint will remain elevated well after the political agreement is signed.
Key Points
- 1Marine war-risk premiums for the Gulf region remain up to 30 times above pre-conflict levels despite the peace deal
- 2Premiums rose from ~0.1–0.25% of vessel value pre-war to a peak of 7.5%, easing to 2.5–3% for Hormuz transits
- 3Insuring a single $100M tanker has cost $3M–$8M per transit during the crisis
- 4US officials estimate naval mine clearance could take up to six months, delaying full traffic restoration
- 5Seven-day policy cancellation clauses and thousands of trapped vessels keep insurers cautious
Why This Matters
The persistence of elevated marine war-risk premiums illustrates a crucial lesson: insurance markets price for demonstrated security, not political announcements. For oil traders, shipping companies, and the global economy, the gap between the peace deal and normalised insurance costs means energy transportation will remain expensive for months, sustaining a portion of the inflationary pressure even as headline oil prices fall. For marine insurers and reinsurers, the conflict has established a new, higher baseline for war-risk pricing in the region — a structural repricing comparable to what followed the Red Sea disruptions of 2024–25.
Related Stories
US-Iran MOU Reopens Strait of Hormuz but Iran's Mandatory Insurance Rule Sparks Sanctions Standoff
June 20, 2026
Triple-I and Munich Re RiskScan 2026 Flags $424 Billion Global Insurance Protection Gap
June 8, 2026
India Opens Insurance Sector to 100% Foreign Direct Investment Under Automatic Route
May 2, 2026
Lloyd's of London Launches War, Terror and Political Violence Consortium Amid Middle East Dislocation
June 10, 2026
Daily Intelligence
The PolicyGlobal Daily Brief
Get the top 5 insurance and finance stories every morning, curated and verified by our editorial desk. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Informational newsletter only. Not financial advice. Disclaimer